Negative Effects of Lowering the Minimum Legal Drinking...

When looking at the drinking age in many nations, a trend of relatively young minimum legal drinking ages (MLDA) can be seen around the world. As it stands, all of America’s 50 states employ a MLDA of 21 making America one of only seven countries in the world to have a drinking age set at 21; the oldest age set as the minimum legal drinking age in the world. Where many of our friends in Europe are happily drinking away at 18, many here in America are left wondering why we don’t employ the same age requirement. Why is it that America has set the age so high as opposed to everyone else? How much more dangerous could drinking at 18 be as opposed to 21? The reason that the MLDA in America is so high is not because America is ignorant or†¦show more content†¦At colleges, the problem persists as well where more than 30% of college students display at least one or more symptoms of alcohol abuse and more than 40% of college students reported one or more symptoms of alc ohol dependence (McCabe). Even so, studies have shown that 21 year old drinking restrictions reduce the amount of underage drinkers. It has been shown that since the implementation of the 21 year old drinking age requirement, binge drinking doesn’t peak until people are between the ages of 21-25 as opposed to 18-20 (Department of Health and Human Services). While the earlier statistic that 72.2% of twelfth graders admit to drinking may be shocking, it is actually down from the percent of underage people drinking since 1984 when the drinking age was increased to 21 (Fell). Not only this but since the drinking age was increased, people continue to drink less through their twenties and into adulthood (Wagenaar). Together with reducing the frequency of underage drinking in America, the MLDA being set at 21 also has reduced the frequency of alcohol consumption in the nation as a whole. In a 2002 study, 87% of analyses found that higher MDLAs were associated with lower alcohol cons umption as a whole (Toomey, Effects of Minimum Drinking Age Laws: Review and Analysis of the Literature from 1960 to 2000). This study is further supported by the NHTSA finding that since 1986, just two years after the 21 year old legal drinking age was enacted, the percentage of weekendShow MoreRelatedThe Minimum Drinking Age Act1700 Words   |  7 Pagesthe National Minimum Drinking Age Act made all 50 states raise the legal drinking age to 21(Dejong). The debate is on whether the age should be lowered or not. Statistically, having the age at 21 has been very helpful in keeping the nation safe. If there is not an issue with age now, would it make sense to lower the age and create unnecessary problems? In this case, the negative effects outweigh the positive. Simply because there is no good in lowering the age. The legal drinking age has been setRead MoreLegalizing the Drinking Age to 181624 Words   |  7 PagesLegalizing the Drinking Age to 18 When people turn to the age of eighteen, they are finally considered an adult. They can join the army, have the right to vote, buy cigarettes or tobacco products, get a tattoo and even die for our country, but they aren’t allowed to buy alcohol? A person can be responsible enough to live on his or her own, make money, pay bills, and yet they are not old enough to purchase or consume any type of alcohol. Underage drinking has been a major controversial issue forRead MoreAmerica Is Against Minimum Legal Drinking Age994 Words   |  4 PagesDrinking Alcohol from High School Senior Year Nice music, best friends, happy families, delicious foods, and amazing gifts are in the high school graduation party, but what’s missing from here? The answer is alcohol. America is against minimum legal drinking age under 21. That means Americans under the age of 21 years old are not allowed to buy beer, wine, or any drink that contains alcohol at the store. Many people complain about this law lately for several good reasons. America’s drinking age shouldRead MorePositive And Negative Effects Of Drinking Alcohol1709 Words   |  7 Pagesthe consumption of alcohol but it can be said that drinking alcohol has both positive and negative effects. Controversy may arise between opposing sides that those below the age of twenty-one are not responsible enough to drink however are allowed a driving license or a driver’s permit. In the United States of America, society and lawmakers focus more on the negative impacts of alcohol consumption especially when it comes to who we allow drinking, and do not consider that teenagers are able to thinkRead MoreThe Minimum Drinking Age Of South Dakota Vs. Dole2398 Words   |  10 PagesAmerican government raised the minimum national drinking age from 18 to 21 as a method to reduce the number of car crashes and deaths caused by underage drunk drivers. The government placed the minimum drinking age law in the Federal Aid Highway Act, and by doing that states were not technically required to keep their minimum drinking age at 21. Given the fact that the law was a part of the Highway Act, if a state wanted to establish a different minimum drinking age, they would be required to surrenderRead MoreThe Drinking Age Of The United States Should Be Lowered929 Words   |  4 PagesAn argument that many tend to dispute today, whether the drinking age of the United States should be lowered from 21 to 18. The drinking age for people to drink alcoholic beverages was made into law by the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. T his ant enforced all states to raise their legal drinking age to 21. To get this law pass, the congress tried to strongarm the states, if the states did not comply, the government would take away their highway funds. Both arguments for it to be lowered and toRead MoreThe Legal Drinking Age At The United States Of America1698 Words   |  7 Pagesthe legal age to drink alcoholic beverages in the United States of America. Some otherwise intelligent people want to lower the legal drinking age to eighteen rather than keep it at twenty-one, the current federally mandated drinking age. In Time Magazine Mary Cary, author of Time to Lower the Drinking Age, puts forth the position that lowering the drinking age would actually be beneficial to society. Though lowering the drinking age to eighteen may lead to solutions to underage drinking, manyRead MoreLegal Drinking Age Should Be Lowered2099 Words   |  9 Pages friends, and the feeling of being invincible. Although there are a legal al cohol drinking and purchasing age in various countries, it is easily accessible to those who are underage. Alcohol is a monitored and controlled substance that can be purchased legally, yet there are many concerns that surround the substance. There are pros, cons, and different patterns regarding alcohol and the legal alcohol drinking and purchasing age. As a result of alcohol use, there have been many fatalities and injuriesRead MoreWhy The Drinking Age During The U.s. Should Be Lowered1300 Words   |  6 PagesInsert name Professor’s name Course/class Date Why the drinking age in the U.S. should be lowered to 18 Getting to 18 years of age is an important milestone for a US resident because it is the legal age for independence, allowing the individual to make his or her decisions regarding tobacco smoking, driving and even joining the armed forces while being treated as an adult by the justice system. While this statement is essentially accurate, it is untrue concerning the ability to purchase and drinkRead MoreLowering The National Drinking Age1698 Words   |  7 PagesLowering the National Drinking Age Winston Churchill was infamous for his one liners and occasional drunken outbursts. One night at a party, he shocked a rather prominent woman with his drunken atrocities. Insulted, she turned to him and said, â€Å"Mr. Churchill, you are as drunk as a dog.† The Prime Minister returned, â€Å"Madam, I may be very drunk, but you are very ugly. But tomorrow,† he added, â€Å"I shall be sober† (Churchill, W). The use and abuse of alcohol is a centuries old vice that has circumnavigated

The Success Of A Company - 3347 Words

Organisations are truly complex entities and for a company to be a success and provide a product or service to the best of its ability, the workforce need to be motivated, ambitious and determined to provide the highest possible quality work within specified time limits. There are numerous things that need to be acknowledged and handled within the organisations structure to ensure that staffs are happy and satisfied in the workplace, alongside the individual’s own personal goals and values. It is the profitable for organisations to make the work environment a comfortable and appealing place for their staff. It is the manager’s job and responsibility to ensure that they are motivating that person for better performance results. Once a†¦show more content†¦This report will also consist of how a manager will incorporate performance related reward schemes to improve overall organisation performance. 1.2 Individuals at Work Within any team consisting of ten people you can immediately notice the range personalities that you are in charge of and the different levels of abilities, experience and energy each person brings to the table. In this kind of team a manager will be dealing with a range of people from different disciplines and backgrounds, a few which could involve engineering technicians, mechanical engineers, design engineers and quality assurance engineers. Each specific person is going to have their own needs, wants, goals and aspirations and once a manager knows what is important for each individual they can then utilise this knowledge and provide the necessary reward scheme required to satisfy and encourage each individual so they thrive and flourish as much as possible while working with that organisation. It is vitally important that your work force feel motivated to ‘give it their all’ while working for you to maximise the organisations overall potential performance. So one of the important question any manager can ask themselves is ‘What can I do to motivate my team?’ and by looking at Maslows hierarchy of needs (Gembapantarei.com, 2014) managers can understand what the fundamental needs are for any worker. 1.3 Personal Abilities and Aptitudes Every organisation is going to try and seek out potential

Why did war break out in Europe in 1939 Free Essays

When Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933 he promised to reverse the Treaty of Versailles, like many Germans Hitler believed that the treaty of Versailles was unjust and blamed Germany’s problems on the peace settlement. He also hate it so much he called the German leaders who signed it ‘The November criminals ‘this shows his hatred towards the treaty, but this wasn’t the only reason why he dislike the treaty so much, the treaty was a constant remainder to Germans of their loss in First World War and the treaty was also a symbol of Germanys defeat and disgrace that came with it, it humiliated the Germany. Hitler thought it would be necessary to destroy the Treaty of Versailles in order to further his aims, also when Hitler came to power, reparations had been reduced and eventually cancelled in 1932 but most of the points were still in place. We will write a custom essay sample on Why did war break out in Europe in 1939? or any similar topic only for you Order Now Hitler’s aims were to change the territorial settlement of Treaty of Versailles by regaining lands which had been taken from Germany at Versailles, including the Saar and Danzig and bring the seven million German-speaking people in Austria, and the four million in Czechoslovakia and Poland, into his empire this again involved destroying the peace settlement of 1919. He also wants to build up his army to prove Germany was still the Great power and to expand in east, probably against communist USSR- Hitler hated Communist. This aim was probably intended for future confirmed as the greatest power in Europe. The first stage of Germans struggle would be to strengthen its lands in Europe. He couldn’t do it alone; Hitler felt the main enemies will be France and USSR, so his aim was to get friendship with Italy and Britain against them. In the 1930s there were two incidents that really tested the League of Nations. The Manchurian Crisis was caused when Japan had been dissatisfied with the peace settlement at the end of the First World War, Many thought the answer would be the expansion of Japan into Manchuria; this would make room for growing population and markets for Japanese good. In September 1931 the Japanese claimed that there had been an explosion on railway line at Mukden, which they said was sabotage by the Chinese, there was no certainty that there had been an explosion but this gave an excuse for the Japanese army to invade. The Japanese army quickly defeated the Chinese at Mukden, they hadn’t got permission from the government but success was so popular in Japan that army was now in control of Japanese policy. China claimed Japan had committed an act of aggression, Japan claimed that it had gone into Manchuria to restore order in the end Japan had done wrong but it had already reorganised Manchuria and called it Manchukuo, and Japan walk out the League. The Abyssinian Crisis was caused when Italy launch an attack on Abyssinia , it was one of few places Africa which had not been taken by the European countries and it was easy to attack because it was next to Italian colonies of Eritrea and Somaliland . The Italians had tried to do this in 1896 but had been defeated at the battle of Adowa; Mussolini planned gain revenge for this defeat and wants to benefit the Italian economy. Italy, like Japan in 1931, was in permanent member of council of the League. The Manchurian Crisis had given Mussolini the impression that the league would not resist an act of aggression by a major power. In these sources you can see the League of Nations non-action in Abyssinian Crisis and Manchurian Crisis showed other nations like Germany that the League are powerless and irrelevant, giving Hitler the impression that he can do what he wants because the league didn’t do anything with the other Crisis’s. In 1936 Hitler began his policy of reclaiming lost German territory and Neville Chamberlain who become prime minister in 1937, he believed in taking an active role in solving Hitler’s grievances , he felt that Germans had good reasons to be upset at many of the terms of the Treaty of Versailles . What he wanted to do was to find what Hitler want and show him that reasonable claims could be met by negotiation instead of by force, so this way the problems of treaty could be solved, Germany could be satisfied and there would be no war, so he made an appeasement and Hitler could get what he wants, little did Chamberlain know of the risks of appeasement. After 1937 Frances supported appeasement because of the increased of security it had with the building of the Maginot line and Britain already agreed because they didn’t want a war and they felt sorry for Germany because of the treaty. Hitler got what he wants with the appeasement. In 1939 Hitler made an agreement with Stalin called the Nazi-Soviet pact, the pact was strange because Fascism and communism were sworn enemies and Hitler never hidden his opposition to communism as expressed in Mein the Kampf. The Nazi-Soviet pact went against the Anti-Comintern pact that Hitler signed with Italy and Japan in 1937, which was in opposed to communism. In the pact the USSR and Germany agreed not interfere against other power in event of war, secret clauses divide Poland between them, the USSR took the land it lost at the end of First World War and Germany receiving the west of Poland including Danzig and the Polish Corridor. This pact benefited both Hitler and Stalin because it meant that Hitler attack on Poland was inevitable and he was prevented two danger of wars on two fronts and in the end they both got bits of Poland. When Hitler invaded Poland in 1939, Britain and France keep their pledge and on 2 September they declared war on Germany , much to Hitler’s surprise, Britain warned him that it would join the war if Germany invade Poland . THERE WAS NO HOPE OF OTHER Munich. Hitler had gone too far. The collapse of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 proved to be last straw for the appeasers. Public opinion in Britain’s was in favour of opposing Hitler. On 1 septemberb1939 German troops invade Poland. On 3 September Britain declared war on Germany. So that’s how invasion of Poland led to war in Europe, Hitler went too far and Britain was not just going to watch!!!. Although it was Hitler’s actions which led to war, many other factors were important in making the war happen like the way the League of Nations handled the Manchurian Crisis and Abyssinian Crisis, it gave a green light to dictators and other country which were trying to bend the rules which the league had set. Hitler took advantage of Crisis’s to put his plans forward to reversed the treaty of Versailles and to get Germany out of there depression, make Germans proud again and make there empire powerful again. There were many other factors that led to war like great depression , it hit USA first and spread like shockwave a cross the world and it was a vicious circle because none of the country could afford to paid its loan or to traded, so no money was coming in and no one was getting paid and there was no money and the people suffered, they just want a way out and Hitler saw a way to get his people out of this by getting out of treaty and getting back his land and others that wasn’t his in first place and by doing this he caused what we know as the second world war. There are hundreds of reason that led towards the war and some are just the timing but most are the fault of Hitler and his malicious planning , he saw an opportunity and he took it , causing country to turn against country ,friends against friends, father against sons ., causing a war we still haven’t recover from emotionally may never do so How to cite Why did war break out in Europe in 1939?, Essays Why Did War Break Out in Europe in 1939 Free Essays When Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933; he had a lot of frustration against the Treaty which he thought was unfair. For example the enormous amount of reparation, it literally got Germany bankrupt. The restriction of army had also caused a lot of anger; Hitler and the Germans felt humiliated as the army used to be Germany’s pride and symbol before the First World War. We will write a custom essay sample on Why Did War Break Out in Europe in 1939 or any similar topic only for you Order Now Moreover, Germany was not allowed self-determination and joining of the League of Nations. These further made the Germans feel humiliated and dishonoured. The loss of colonies and territories had not only made Germany lost human resources, they were also important industrial areas which provide resources and markets. Therefore when Hitler came to power in 1933, he pledged that he would abolish the treaty to recover the Germany economy brings back German’s pride. Hitler also felt a strong necessity of increasing German territory, which came from the idea of ‘Lebensraum’, a German word for living space. His aimed was clearly to bring Germany back to where it was before the war, a proud and strong nation. In the 1930s there were two incidents that really tested the League of Nations; they were the invasion of Manchuria and the Abyssinia crisis. During the Japanese invasion of Manchuria, the league had done a bad job by delaying to solve their own local problems- it took them a year to produce a report to condemn the Japanese in1933 (when Hitler came to power). However, Japan intended to invade more of China to ‘defend their selves’, thus the powerless League voted to approve it when only Japanese voted against as an insult. Witnessing the incident, Hitler could be almost certain that League was too useless and weak to stop his future actions. In 1936 he took a huge risk by sending German troops to remilitarise Rhineland; however he was confident due to the incident happened in Manchuria, as well as the Abyssinian crisis which was happening at the exact same time. The league was too weak by then as they were distracted by the Abyssinian crisis; they only condemned Hitler’s action but had no power to do anything else. Thus Hitler won; the remilitarisation of Rhineland as well as a huge gain in confidence. In 1936 Hitler began his policy of reclaiming lost German territory. He wanted an â€Å"Anschluss with Austria†, that is to bring the two nations together even though they were banned to ally under the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler started to manipulate the Nazis to stir up trouble, to call for democratic plebiscite and eventually he sent his own troops into Austria to â€Å"defend democracy†, when the real intention was probably to make sure people vote for Anschluss under the watchful eyes of the army. British Prime Minister, Chamberlin, had also supported the idea of uniting Austrian with the Germans. Britain and France had both followed the policy of Appeasement in the 1930s. Britain’s leaders may have felt they had no option but to appease Hitler, even when there were obvious risks to such a policy such as it would encourage Hitler to be aggressive, allowed Germany to grow too strong, etc. France was invaded by Germany a several times and thus feeling a need to make peace. However, the main reason could be that they felt too vulnerable to go on war that they were perhaps in denial of Hitler’s potential and danger with or without their own acknowledgement. In 1938, Hitler had successfully took over Sudetenland very much due to the leaders of Britain and France’s naivety of trusting Hitler as well as their reluctance to go on war to stop Hitler’s action. In 1939 Hitler made an agreement with Stalin not to attack one another. They signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact and announced the terms to the world. While privately they also agreed to divide Poland between them. Stalin was very worried as Hitler had openly stated his interest in conquering the Russian land. He signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact because he was not convinced that Britain and France would be strong and reliable enough as allies against Hitler. Another advantage was that he had planned to take over the Baltic states of eastern Poland, which had been part of Russia in the Tsar’s day. Although he did not believe Hitler would keep his word anymore, but he hoped the alliance with Germany could buy him time to build up his forces against the attack he knew would come. To Hitler’s advantage, he saw Russia as a good geographical ally in a sense hat he would have helpers up in the north if a war breaks out in the west. Hitler and the Soviet forces invaded Poland in 1939; one right after another. Poland was soon taken over by the two nations. However, it was not satisfying for Hitler, he demanded even more. He was certain that Britain and France would be weak as they always had been and would not risk going on war over Poland, and thus he planned an attack on his temporary al ly, the USSR. However, this time the Britain and France kept their pledge and stood up for France, declaring a war against Germany. Hitler was caught by surprise, the war broke out sooner than he had expected and it was against the wrong opponents. Hitler would have never predicted that the invasion of Poland would lead to war in Europe and eventually turned into a World War again. Despite the fact that it was Hitler’s actions which led to war, many other factors were important in making the war happen. As I have mentioned it was the League’s incapability in settling peace that had led to frustration of the Germans to tear up the treaty. It was Britain and France’s weakness that had gained Hitler’s confidence and encouraged him to gamble more the next time. It was the various countries’ fear and reluctance to go on war to stop Hitler that had allowed him to take a bigger step each time. After all, Hitler was just taking advantage in every situation before the war and was responding to people’s weakness and naivety by demanding for more. When Britain and France finally stood up to declare war on Germany, Hitler was already stronger than before and it in the end it turned out to be another World War. How to cite Why Did War Break Out in Europe in 1939, Essay examples

Cross Culture And its Attitude Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Cross Culture And its Attitude. Answer: Introduction Contact between people from different cultures is increasing that is giving more importance to cross cultural attitudes (Min Kim, 2013)). People have different opinions about different culture people. It can be negative or positive. People should respect the values of all the cultures as values, beliefs are the major component of culture. Culture provide a perceptive for understanding the world. People are contributing towards this by learning new languages to understand other culture people and make them feel familiar. Many business are working on this and helping their employees to learn languages so that they can communicate with different culture people and can value other people culture. Prejudice, Racism, and Discrimination. Prejudice is a wide social phenomenon. It is used to refer to unfavorable, judgments towards person due to social class, disability, religion, language, gender, age, nationality, etc. Stereotypes representation of a person, group or society is known as Prejudice (Diplomba. 2017). In this people from one culture make opinions and judge other people from different culture. These opinions and judgments are not based on any reason or experience. From psychological point of view people start discriminating each other and it separates different nations. There are different types of prejudice such as Groundless prejudice, nominal prejudice, Tokenism prejudice, Familiar and unfamiliar prejudice, Individual prejudice, A long arm prejudice, Favors and antipathies prejudice, Institutional prejudice (Lumen. 2017). Racism means belief of people of each race own features, skills, or abilities specific to that race. It separate people into hierarchies according to the race. Due to genetic differences it has been said that unequal treatment among dissimilar culture is fair. Racism is faced by cultures that are different from other culture people according to their physical features and characteristics of their culture. Racism started in the eighteenth century (Diplomba. 2017). It is the most talked issue in todays society. Types of racism are scientific racism, new racism, historical racism, unaware/self-righteous racism, aware/blatant racism, institutional racism, internalized racism, unaware/unintentional racism and aware/covert racism. Discrimination refers to the attitude of people from one culture denies to give equal treatment to people because they are from different culture. Discrimination is built on the fantasies, feelings, beliefs and motivation of prejudice (Communication. 2017). One of the discrimination is institutional discrimination. It means denying to allow certain groups for providing resources, privileges and opportunities. Importance of Cross culture attitude Diversification is growing due to globalized markets, speedy communication and quick transport, the world is getting affected by terrorism and the evil actions of all the world powers. All these anger and negative powers are reason of failure on the global and individual levels. If world want to live happily and in peace then it is important to understand issues of inter-cultural and inter-racial relationships and its attitudes (Ingram, 2005). Learning language effect cross cultural attitudes positively as it helps in developing knowledge of different culture. Cross culture attitude helps in changing the attitude of one culture people towards people from other culture people. Cross culture attitude is important for increasing capability to make fair decisions and to appreciate opinions of different culture people. Cross culture attitude is important for learning and understanding other cultures and their people. It also increase the respect for other countries and their culture. Cross culture attitude encourages the essence of international cooperation (Ingram, 2005). Hofstedes cultural dimensions theory Hofstedes theory delivered a structure for cross cultural communication and Geert Hofstede presented the theory. It explains the impacts of the values and cultures of the people belonging to the society. With the help of factor analysis the relation between the values and behavior can be identified. The theory provided four dimensions such as individualism-collectivism; uncertainty avoidance; power distance (strength of social hierarchy) and masculinity-femininity (task orientation versus person-orientation). As the research conducted in the Hong Kong it influenced Hofstede to involve the fifth dimension in his theory i.e. long term orientations to cover those points which were not discussed previously. Indulgence versus self-restraint was the sixth dimension added by the Hofstede (Ideas. 2017). His theory was used widely in different fields for research. This research helped and inspired other studies of cross culture. Cultural dimensions model of Hofstede- Critical analysis Competition is gaining attention internationally and markets are changing very quickly. It influence the management of the company to analyze the culture of their own country as well as the culture of host country (Grin. 2011). The concept management of cross culture is grasping importance to understand the needs of cultural differences. Cultural dimensions model of Hofstede has achieved proportional position and draws notice of the increasing importance of understand the cross culture. Global operating organizations used Hofstedes model widely for its workshops and training. Cross cultural management model was affective and was creating awareness about existence of differences in the culture that shows strategies of home country might not be beneficial in the host country. (Ly, 2013). Besides this Hofstedes cultural study said to be important and was widely known. Many cultural studies were done but they were supporting Hofstedes study partially. All the models which were identified collected praises as well as criticism including Hofstedes model. Hofstedes model was mainly criticized about its validity and consistency. Another criticism received by his theory was about its survey findings it was said that they are outdated. Considering the presented criticisms from the literature, to evaluate the validity and consistency, imitation study was done in the 21st century in the countries of Germany and the UK. Through this study dimension scores were developed for Masculinity/ Feministy (MAS) and Uncertaininty Avoidance (UA) for Germany and UK and results were analyzed with the findings of Hofstedes model. It was discovered that the findings of this study were different from the findings of Hofstedes. As the finding of the study conducted in Germany and UK were not supporting Hofstedes models findings so recommendation was given for cultural research (Grin. 2011). Ideas for future research in Cross culture Besides, five cultural dimensions of Hofstedes theory, there are other factors also available which can be considered for the study of study cross culture. Different levels were avoided to use in the study as the structure of the levels was not supporting the subject of the model. These levels are Individual level, Organizational level, Occupational level and Gender level. Conclusion In the conclusion it can be said that it is important to study cross cultural attitudes to understand and respect all the cultures. It is important to learn languages as it will guide the person to provide fair decisions. Cross culture atiitude is important for learning and increasing knowledge about different cultures. People should not consider themselves to be superior and should not discriminate other culture people. Racism and Prejudice should be avoided. In the essay Prejudice, racism and discriminations is explained to aware people about it. Importance of cross culture attitude is also discussed above to show the importance of this topic. Theory of Hefstedes cross cultural is used to explain different dimensions. Critical evaluation is provided for this theory and future ideas are provided for cross culture research. References Min, C Kim, H. (2013). Relationship between cross-cultural attitudes and attitudes toward the foreign language study of tourism majors. Journal of tourism and cultural change. 11(2). 109-125. Ingram, D. E. (2005). Language Learning and Cross-Cultural Attitudes. Retrieved from: https://www.tesolchile.cl/documents/sept2005/DEIngram_fullpaper_Oct2004.htm Diplomba. (2017). Racism and prejudice and their role in cross-cultural communication. Retrieved from: https://diplomba.ru/work/77760 Communication. (2017). Culture, Prejudice, Racism, and Discrimination. Retrieved from: https://communication.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-164 Grin. (2011). Critical analysis of Hofstedes model of cultural dimensions. Retrieved from: https://www.grin.com/en/e-book/169716/critical-analysis-of-hofstede-s-model-of-cultural-dimensions Ideas. (2017). A Critical Approach to Hofstedes Model on Cultural Dimensions. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxiiy2012i12p644-649.html Ly, A. (2013). A critical discussion of Hofstedes concept of Power Distance. Retrieved from: https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2393819/Ly_28.pdf?sequence=1 Lumen. (2017). Prejudice and Discrimination. Retrieved from: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wsu-sandbox/chapter/prejudice-and-discrimination/